what a shame for the athlon xps. such great procs at such unreasonable prices. the whole point about xps was the low price and high performance. here in the uk they cost even more and are virtually non-existent. i remember one time when "old" technology used to sell for less...
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
9 Comments
Back to Article
KristopherKubicki - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
PrinceGaz: The tables are automatically generated.It seems FX-55 availability is very poor.
http://labs.anandtech.com/links.php?pfilter=1239
Kristopher
PrinceGaz - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
On page 2, why does the A64 S939 price list have the FX-53 which is no longer generally available, rather than the FX-55?Before the FX-53 went out of stock here in the UK, it was more or less the same price as the FX-55 which replaced it.
Kalessian - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
#1, I'm pretty sure it's the retailers that are doing the price gouging. Low supply, high demand, etc.KristopherKubicki - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
Hey Guys,January 2005 it is.
Kristopher
TinyTeeth - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
Are you absolutely sure you don't mean Januari 2005?AtaStrumf - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
... and 2 times L2 cache.Visual - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
ugh... why would the A64 2800+ "officially belong" below the sempron 3100+? its the same cpu but with 64bit support.... :/benk - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
Err...January 2005?semo - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link
what a shame for the athlon xps. such great procs at such unreasonable prices. the whole point about xps was the low price and high performance. here in the uk they cost even more and are virtually non-existent. i remember one time when "old" technology used to sell for less...shame on you amd!